Re: strace only one child process
- From: "tmp123" <tmp123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Oct 2006 04:23:48 -0700
phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On 21 Oct 2006 03:35:52 -0700 tmp123 <tmp123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| About modify "strace", it is a posibility. I should evaluate the
| necessary effort. The idea will be add to the "-f" option an optional
| numerical argument: maximum number of childs to follow.
I would suggest integrating it with the -e option, allowing _any_ kind
of specifiable event to be counted to determine when to stop tracing
that event or to stop strace altogether. Then while you would be using
it to count a maximum of fork() calls, someone else might find value in
stopping tracing after some number of open() calls.
Yes, is true. A program like "truss" allows 3 lists of independent
events: the ones to trace, the ones to start the trace and the ones to
end it.
I'm wondering why "strace" does not have it.
Kind regards.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: strace only one child process
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: strace only one child process
- References:
- strace only one child process
- From: tmp123
- Re: strace only one child process
- From: John Reiser
- Re: strace only one child process
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: strace only one child process
- From: John Reiser
- Re: strace only one child process
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: strace only one child process
- From: tmp123
- Re: strace only one child process
- From: phil-news-nospam
- strace only one child process
- Prev by Date: Opening a /dev file from Kernel space
- Next by Date: Re: Few queries
- Previous by thread: Re: strace only one child process
- Next by thread: Re: strace only one child process
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|