Re: a patch for more virtual consoles?
- From: phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 24 Oct 2006 19:50:14 GMT
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:33:00 -0000 Grant Edwards <grante@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
| On 2006-10-24, phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx <phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
|> On 23 Oct 2006 11:43:36 -0700 Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|>
|>| phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx wrote:
|>|> Anyone know of a kernel patch for more virtual consoles of the text variety?
|>|
|>| No. But how many virtual consoles do you need? Is the current limit of
|>| 64 virtual consoles too small?
|>
|> Yup. I'm already using them all. I would have liked to see a whole major
|> dedicated to this. Many device classes have a whole major number where
|> one might never use more than 2 or 3 of them.
|
| It's just idle curiosity -- how do you use up 64 virtual
| consoles?
Lots of stuff going on. 3 of them are used for 3 instances of X. The
rest are logged in on various aspects of things I'm doing.
I don't really need 256 of them. But a few more than I have now would
be nice. Then I could eliminate using screen.
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2006-10-24-1448@xxxxxxxx |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
.
- References:
- a patch for more virtual consoles?
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: a patch for more virtual consoles?
- From: Lew Pitcher
- Re: a patch for more virtual consoles?
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: a patch for more virtual consoles?
- From: Grant Edwards
- a patch for more virtual consoles?
- Prev by Date: Re: a patch for more virtual consoles?
- Next by Date: System calls parameter restrictions
- Previous by thread: Re: a patch for more virtual consoles?
- Next by thread: HDD Diagnostic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|