Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- From: "David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Dec 2006 15:05:01 -0800
phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx wrote:
It's definitely (still) time for a whole new computer I/O architecture
design that does not involve interrupt identification separate from the
device identity. The original IRQ was supposed to be a priority level
on a very small machine with few devices. That's just a mess for today's
needs. What we need is a machine with each device having a unique ID
that spells out both it's memory address range as well as it's interrupt
ID (being the same ID). Maybe that would be an ID bound to a slot or
maybe it would be settable on the boards. The OS can then map those
devices as needed.
I believe this is precisely what MSI does (message signaled
interrupts).
http://lwn.net/Articles/44139/
DS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- References:
- why inter-changing pci slot works?
- From: Himanshu Chauhan
- Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- From: Himanshu Chauhan
- Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- From: phil-news-nospam
- why inter-changing pci slot works?
- Prev by Date: Re: regarding ifconfig command
- Next by Date: Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- Previous by thread: Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- Next by thread: Re: why inter-changing pci slot works?
- Index(es):