Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: "David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Mar 2007 13:33:19 -0700
On Mar 12, 4:26 am, phil-news-nos...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
The start/create cost is relevant. It's just not the only thing that is
relevant. I think what you are trying to say here is that the whole cost
of threads vs. processes has to be considered, not just the creation cost.
The start/create cost is relevant. What is not relevant is comparing
the cost of creating *one* process to *one* thread. Perhaps it might
make the top fifty list, but it's preposterous for it to be the first
thing people talk about when comparing two completely different types
of approaches.
DS
.
- References:
- help with huge memory consumption??
- From: Dan Miller
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- From: phil-news-nospam
- help with huge memory consumption??
- Prev by Date: extracting initramfs
- Next by Date: Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- Previous by thread: Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- Next by thread: Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|