Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 16 Mar 2007 04:10:16 -0700
Hi Josef,
But telnet/(t)ftp/[rs]sh are implemented in user land.Good point, I agree.
ISO/OSI Layer 5 is the Session Layer, not the Transport Layer!
Only put into the kernel what must absolutely belong into the kernel! IBut if you do not want to change existing applications (which use
see no reason why the Session Layer should be implemented in kernel space.
interfaces like socket()...) then it would be necessary to change
something either in the kernel or in a system library.
So it depends on whether you have to consider migration or not...
Thanks
Christian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: Josef Moellers
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- References:
- Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: Josef Moellers
- Adding a new OSI layer
- Prev by Date: Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- Next by Date: Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- Previous by thread: Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- Next by thread: Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- Index(es):