Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 16 Mar 2007 09:24:22 -0700
Hi,
Not quite: you could easily add another library and then require suchOk, so you could do migration with an user space only solutions as
applications (or their users) to LD_PRELOAD such a library. Haven't
tried that, though.
But it should work, as efence uses that to force an application to use
modified malloc/free functions. I guess that the socks package does so, too.
Maybe you'd have to use a few tricks to call the "standard" socket() and
friends but that could be solved as well. Maybe you'd really look at
socks. Haven't used that, though, too.
well.
But - given this fiftth layer would be something important and useful
and requires adding protocol headers to the transport layer headers -
I guess that it should belong to the OS (kernel).
Cheers
Christian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: Josef Moellers
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- References:
- Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: Josef Moellers
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: Josef Moellers
- Adding a new OSI layer
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux kernel, possible useless continue
- Next by Date: review chapter of new OS textbook, get book and acknowledgement
- Previous by thread: Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- Next by thread: Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- Index(es):