Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 18 Mar 2007 20:39:34 GMT
On 16 Mar 2007 02:42:31 -0700 chrb81@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
| Obviously, as this is related to the network stack, it must belong to
| the OS core and not be just implemented within an user space library.
Not necessarily. If it needs access below what the socket layer can
provide, then sure, it needs to be in the stack. But if what sockets
do provide now, for UDP and TCP, is usable, this could be done inside
a library.
| TCP/UDP/... are in the kernel, aren't they? So the transport layer
| mechanism itself is also part of the kernel, or not?
They managed to make a library implementation of SCTP (another transport
layer). Granted, it is limited to user processes with root permissions.
Is what you are doing also at the same level?
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2007-03-18-1537@xxxxxxxx |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- References:
- Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- From: chrb81
- Adding a new OSI layer
- Prev by Date: Re: help with huge memory consumption??
- Next by Date: Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- Previous by thread: Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- Next by thread: Re: Adding a new OSI layer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|