Re: GCC problem

From: Ulrich Eckhardt <doomster@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:16:28 +0200

westymatt wrote:

I switched my code over to using what I believe to be the K&R style
function definitions.

That would be incredibly stupid. The simple reason is that it's
old&deprecated and non-standard. Any compiler worth its name should reject
it, unless explicitly instructed to do otherwise.

Uli

.

References:
- GCC problem
  - From: westymatt

Prev by Date: Re: to make soft interrupt with AX registers in linux?
Next by Date: GCC problem
Previous by thread: GCC problem
Next by thread: Re: GCC problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: folding aces?
... running to "mommy" for moral support and to have simple english ... The reason I asked others about your post was ... because it was so incredibly stupid it made posts by people like storman99 ... Not a Mark King fan, ...
(rec.gambling.poker)
Re: EA NASCAR settings
... Turn off the driver aids. ... keep in mind that the demo is based off of version 1.0 which for ... some (incredibly stupid) reason didn't feature a locked differential, ...
(rec.autos.simulators)
Re: Your bid
... Can't see any reason to go non-standard. ... Mmbridge ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.games.bridge)
Re: ? printf Hex Escape Character Not Working
... You put code in a string literal for "whatever reason"? ... I am not going to look for a reason to put a code into a character ... language because you think there isn't any. ... developer to choose the behavior of non-standard things. ...
(microsoft.public.vc.language)
Re: gfortran : unknown functions itime and idate
... and idate and itime both work properly ... The reason that "someone described them" that way is because it is true. ... that's one of the things that happen with non-standard code. ...
(comp.lang.fortran)