Re: lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- From: phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Jul 2007 13:03:49 GMT
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:31:05 +0100 Tim Southerwood <ts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| The first line is not correct, though it doesn't break due to "long long"
| being good enough in this case, but you really need to follow the header
| definitions faithfully otherwise random bad things will happen in the
| future. lseek returns an off_t, so that's what you should use.
Like when we add "long long long long" to be 128 bits and change file
offset bits to be 128 :-)
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2007-07-26-0801@xxxxxxxx |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
.
- References:
- lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- From: guru
- Re: lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- From: spacecriter \(Bill C\)
- Re: lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- From: guru
- Re: lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- From: Tim Southerwood
- lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- Prev by Date: Re: lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- Next by Date: Re: Einstein?s mathematical excellence and Newton?s insightful perception of mass- energy inter conversion (E=mc2)
- Previous by thread: Re: lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- Next by thread: Re: lseek: Value too large for defined data type
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|