Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- From: "LaBird" <b_cheung_2005@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:08:41 +0800
Hi Phil,
<phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:44:57 +0800 LaBird <b_cheung_2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However, I don't agree that there is any significant benefit to this.
While 48-bits does provide sufficient address space to do that, I think
it is a bad idea to do so just because it can be done.
What about using it to support a cluster-wide address space like some SASOS
(single address space operating systems)?
Get more RAM. If you have an application that uses a LOT of RAM, get a
LOT.
I may be wrong, but is the maximum amount of RAM that can be inserted into a
machine limited by the motherboard?
(Sorry if this goes too far from the original topic.)
Best Regards,
LaBird (Benny).
.
- References:
- Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- From: LaBird
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- From: Wolfgang Draxinger
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- From: LaBird
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- From: LaBird
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- Prev by Date: Re: running Linux with no swap space (but lots of RAM)
- Next by Date: Re: running Linux with no swap space (but lots of RAM)
- Previous by thread: Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
- Next by thread: new filesystem module
- Index(es):