Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS

From: J de Boyne Pollard <j.deboynepollard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:06:40 -0800 (PST)

p> Given that a lot of the real address space is highly
p> structured (similar to how the way-over-addressed
p> 128-bit IPv6 network address space is done), [...]

JdeBP> The deprecation of site-local IP version 6
JdeBP> addresses is worth noting, in this context.

p> How does this context make that worth noting?

It provides an example of how such structure is altered, and the
effects that such alterations cause; and also provides an example of
how an initially chosen structure can be considered later to be wrong.
.

References:
- Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
  - From: LaBird
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
  - From: Wolfgang Draxinger
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
  - From: LaBird
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
  - From: phil-news-nospam
- Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
  - From: J de Boyne Pollard
- Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
  - From: phil-news-nospam

Prev by Date: Re: running Linux with no swap space (but lots of RAM)
Next by Date: Debugger for 2.6 Kernel
Previous by thread: Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
Next by thread: Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
... | JdeBP> addresses is worth noting, in this context. ... have never created analog television because digital television is better? ...
(comp.os.linux.development.system)
Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
... JdeBP> addresses is worth noting, in this context. ... have never created analog television ...
(comp.os.linux.development.system)
Re: Question on mmap() in 64-bit OS
... | The deprecation of site-local IP version 6 addresses is worth noting, ... How does this context make that worth noting? ... IPv6, so I will refrain. ...
(comp.os.linux.development.system)