Re: User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:07:53 +0100
Bernhard Agthe <dark2star@xxxxxxx> writes:
My plan is to create a very simple kernel module that probably uses
direct socket code to perform ethernet frame transmission and reception.
There's something like that, the TUN/TAP interface which provides access
to the raw sockets. This is used e.g. by the former ethereal or by
various IPsec/VPN solutions.
TUN/TAP is a virtual network interface, which can be used to forward
ethernet frames or IP datagrams addressed to certain destinations to
some 'ordinary' process, which can also inject 'somehow constructed'
replies/ packing coming from such a destination by writing them to the
chardev associated with a particual TUN (IP) or TAP (ethernet) device.
'raw sockets' are something completely different.
.
- References:
- User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- From: Andrew Greensted
- Re: User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- From: Andrew Greensted
- Re: User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- From: Bernhard Agthe
- User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- Prev by Date: Re: User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- Next by Date: Re: User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- Previous by thread: Re: User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- Next by thread: Re: User-space controlled raw ethernet - Is this the way to go?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|