Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Mar 2008 12:55:01 GMT
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:09:26 -0000 ellis@xxxxxxx wrote:
| In article <fri1to01vjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
|>Each swapped out page should only need to be swapped back in
|>just once, if this is the only active process.
|
| Yes, but swapping in a page may mean swapping out others to
| make room. How tight is memory on that system?
It is a tight system. The big question is, how well does the kernel do
to be sure that when it picks something to swap out, that it avoids the
pages of the process it is currently making active.
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-03-17-0754@xxxxxxxx |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
.
- References:
- excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: Pierre Asselin
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From:
- excessive swap-in time
- Prev by Date: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Next by Date: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Previous by thread: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Next by thread: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|