Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: talon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michel Talon)
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:43:48 +0000 (UTC)
Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Believe it or not, but some (actually, quite a few) people are really
old enough to personally remember the time when this was the general
and not exceptional case.
And beleive it or not i am old enough to have seen Linux systems
constantly trashing under load precisely because badly chosen pages
were evicted, while the same computer worked perfectly fine
with FreeBSD. I was under the impression that this problem was solved
with recent Linux kernels. The problem is not that the computer will
not work better if i add ten times more memory and there is no paging
activity at all, of course. But that it can work well enough, and almost
at the same speed with a moderate and constant stream of paging, if the
paging algorithm is good, which means keeping statistics on what pages
are freqently used, to avoid evicting them, and avoid using big bursts
of large paging activities (this was Linux speciality) which almost
always induce trashing - that is you have to page in pages you have
recently paged out, exactly the symptom the original poster described.
--
Michel TALON
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- References:
- excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: Jan Knutar
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: Michel Talon
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- excessive swap-in time
- Prev by Date: Re: Dynamic linking with LD_PRELOAD - get it compiled
- Next by Date: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Previous by thread: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Next by thread: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|