Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: talon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michel Talon)
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:45 +0000 (UTC)
phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx wrote:
If we could:
1. Correctly identify pages that won't be needed for a long time in the
future (those that have not been used for a long time in the past are
an estimate of probability for this)
2. Ensure that excessive outswapping caused by heavy I/O, especially heavy
writing, does not happen
3. Ensure a process swapping back in after dormancy does not cause some
of itself to swap out (assuming the working set can fit)
Then we would do well with less RAM and more swap. And I for one would
like to see the kernel reach this utopia.
You should do some tests with FreeBSD. In the past, when i had a machine
with very limited memory, it was doing quite well in this exercise.
--
Michel TALON
.
- References:
- excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: Jan Knutar
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: Michel Talon
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: excessive swap-in time
- From: phil-news-nospam
- excessive swap-in time
- Prev by Date: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Next by Date: Re: Dynamic linking with LD_PRELOAD - get it compiled
- Previous by thread: Re: excessive swap-in time
- Next by thread: software interruption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|