Re: syscall reference
- From: "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:51:52 GMT
In other words IPC looks like a good place to begin learning the kernel.
Even if technically I am not using the kernel. And there is alot more than
pipes, there's signals and so on here but pipes are a good place to start.
Read and write are only a couple of examples of what a complete syscall
reference should give. The trouble is that the linux kernel is living. By
that I mean it's not like and old Unix v6 or 7 for a pdp. So much has
changed from 2.0 or even the 2.2 code to buy a reference might seem in the
long run fruitless. Then again it might be worth it.
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: syscall reference
- From: Joe Pfeiffer
- Re: syscall reference
- References:
- syscall reference
- From: Bill Cunningham
- Re: syscall reference
- From: Joe Pfeiffer
- syscall reference
- Prev by Date: Re: syscall reference
- Next by Date: Way cool
- Previous by thread: Re: syscall reference
- Next by thread: Re: syscall reference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|