Re: setrlimit() extension suggestion
- From: David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 29, 11:24 am, phil-news-nos...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
You: Wouldn't it be nice if cars had a feature where they stopped
running at 3AM every Thursday?
Me: No. Why would that be good?
You don't need to understand the why. You can choose to dismiss the idea
because you can't see any reason _you_ would want to use it. Maybe someone
else won't.
Just in case you don't understand the rules of feature suggestion, it
goes like this: The person suggesting a feature must state at least
one use case. If the person suggesting the feature cannot defend that
use case, they have to stop asking for the feature.
DS
.
- References:
- setrlimit() extension suggestion
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: setrlimit() extension suggestion
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: setrlimit() extension suggestion
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: setrlimit() extension suggestion
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: setrlimit() extension suggestion
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: setrlimit() extension suggestion
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: setrlimit() extension suggestion
- From: phil-news-nospam
- setrlimit() extension suggestion
- Prev by Date: Re: write
- Next by Date: device or pipe
- Previous by thread: Re: setrlimit() extension suggestion
- Next by thread: Netlink sockets problem in Fedora Core 8 2.6.23.1-42 Kernel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|