Re: Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- From: David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 14, 5:15 pm, phil-news-nos...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Both eth0 and eth1 are configured with the same set of IP addresses:
eth0 172.30.16.5/16
eth0:0 172.30.0.7/16
eth0:1 172.30.0.13/16
eth0:2 172.30.0.48/16
eth1 172.30.16.5/16
eth1:0 172.30.0.7/16
eth1:1 172.30.0.13/16
eth1:2 172.30.0.48/16
If there is some way this could possibly make sense, I can't think of
it. It would help if you explained what these interfaces were
connected to so that we have some hope of understanding what you're
trying to do. Why would you assign the same IP address to the same
host two different ways?
DS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- References:
- Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- Prev by Date: Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- Previous by thread: Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- Next by thread: Re: Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process
- Index(es):