Re: Kernel drops UDP datagrams between interface and process

You are welcome to continue to insist that a configuration that makes
no logical sense should work. But it doesn't, and it won't. What you
want is called bonding under Linux, whether you think it should be or
not.

You claim this is supposed to be for failover, but you have no
failover mechanism. There are many ways to do network interface
failover in Linux, but this is not one of them.

DS
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Multiple default routes on multiple interfaces
    ... >and two interfaces for my linux box. ... I just want failover between the two lines, ... >with next-hop detection if possible. ... >single interface and single IP on the linux box. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Linux ethernet bonding like driver
    ... AK> I have a situation where my servers (Freebsd Solaris ... AK> and Linux) are connected to two independent switches ... AK> want to group 2 adapters in a active-standby failover ... AK> IPs and figure if the link is up but connectivity has ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Re: [SLE] Looking for a book that describes highly available DHCP setups
    ... I'm looking for a book that explains reliable and manageable DHCP setups. ... it should cover installations with failover and load balancing configurations of dhcpd. ... Without such a second server, all clients would not work any more after the lease expired. ... I'm not interested in technology explanation and configuration examples. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Linux ethernet bonding like driver
    ... I have a situation where my servers (Freebsd Solaris ... want to group 2 adapters in a active-standby failover ... Under Linux I can use the Ethernet bonding ... IPs and figure if the link is up but connectivity has ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Re: updating to 2003
    ... > i'm faced with the task of updating windows 2000 advanced server ... > (with 2 active directory/fileservers clustered together in failover ... > configuration). ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)