Re: remote X vs VNC
From: Michael Schnell (mschnell_at_lumino.de)
Date: 07/16/03
- Next message: Trevor Barton: "Re: Have ext3 on SanDisk CF but can't disable write-back caching as kernel instructs"
- Previous message: Grant Edwards: "Re: remote X vs VNC"
- In reply to: Ingo Pakleppa: "Re: remote X vs VNC"
- Next in thread: Larry Doolittle: "Re: remote X vs VNC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:17:51 +0200
> Its main
> drawback is that the VNC X Server actually runs on the Linux side and
> takes up memory there.
So not a good idea for remote controlling an embedded device.
> Unfortunately, the X protocol cannot easily be
> squeezed through SSH, at least not completely without a kludge.
But it should pass a VPN if security is needed.
-Michael
- Next message: Trevor Barton: "Re: Have ext3 on SanDisk CF but can't disable write-back caching as kernel instructs"
- Previous message: Grant Edwards: "Re: remote X vs VNC"
- In reply to: Ingo Pakleppa: "Re: remote X vs VNC"
- Next in thread: Larry Doolittle: "Re: remote X vs VNC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
