Re: MontaVista Linux
From: Geronimo W. Christ Esq (thegreatsuprendo_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 05/29/05
- Next message: Grant Edwards: "Re: Suggestions for custom application-layer protocol?"
- Previous message: Paul Keinanen: "Re: Suggestions for custom application-layer protocol?"
- In reply to: rob: "MontaVista Linux"
- Next in thread: Michael Schmid: "Re: MontaVista Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 13:42:46 +0100
rob wrote:
> Why MontaVista does not upgrade their Linux support from 2.4 to 2.6 version?
> I was told that 2.6 is much more powerful than 2.4.
I believe MVL are working on 2.6, but it's a lot of work; they support a
stack of different boards.
BTW I'm not at all convinced that 2.6 has been "hardened" enough yet for
production purposes. There are reports of performance problems on the
most recent release of the kernel source. I'd rather stick with a nice,
stable 2.4 kernel until that gets sorted.
- Next message: Grant Edwards: "Re: Suggestions for custom application-layer protocol?"
- Previous message: Paul Keinanen: "Re: Suggestions for custom application-layer protocol?"
- In reply to: rob: "MontaVista Linux"
- Next in thread: Michael Schmid: "Re: MontaVista Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|