Re: Dumb question on embedded Linux - why?
From: Grant Edwards (grante_at_visi.com)
Date: 10/15/05
- Next message: Slawek: "ucLinux.org down ?"
- Previous message: Anton Erasmus: "Re: Recommand ARM Emulator / Demo board"
- In reply to: Drily Lit Raga: "Re: Dumb question on embedded Linux - why?"
- Next in thread: giangiammy_at_gmail.com: "Re: Dumb question on embedded Linux - why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:25:40 -0000
On 2005-10-15, Drily Lit Raga <midicad2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> 2) It's not real-time?
>>
>> Linux doesn't guarantee latencies between events and the
>> handling of those events. The latencies caused by the kernel
>> have been greatly improved recently, but it's still not
>> suitable for hard, low-latency, real-time projects.
>
> But it still gets used in "real-time" applications,
It's good enough for some applications, not for others. A
buddy of mine recently worked on a project where they had to
ditch Linux because the latencies were just too large. IIRC
they switched to LynxOS.Since it has a Linux-compatible ABI,
they could just re-compile the applications and go.
> being "good enough" because a modern-day CPU has plenty of raw
> speed.
That depends on the application and on the CPU.
> Of course if you want that on a PIC I don't know....
No, I wasn't expecting to run Linux on a PIC.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! ... A housewife
at is wearing a polypyrene
visi.com jumpsuit!!
- Next message: Slawek: "ucLinux.org down ?"
- Previous message: Anton Erasmus: "Re: Recommand ARM Emulator / Demo board"
- In reply to: Drily Lit Raga: "Re: Dumb question on embedded Linux - why?"
- Next in thread: giangiammy_at_gmail.com: "Re: Dumb question on embedded Linux - why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|