Re: LGPL and code attached
- From: noone <noone@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:50:55 -0400
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:34:49 -0700, satamara wrote:
if we modified the library which is under LGPL, does the code (or
process code) that uses the modfied lib. needs to be opened along with
it?
No...That's why the LGPL is superior...you still need to open source your
modifications to the library though.
Also, better to run-time link to the .so to avoid questions about "derived
works".
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: [OT] Advice on software license for my project
... Well, no, but they have to distribute those modifications under the LGPL. ... If the library is used in an open source product, you get the source of the product in return. ... You can license it to them under whatever terms you want. ... Also it would be worthwhile to actually read the LGPL or GPL. ...
(alt.os.linux) - Re: [OT] Advice on software license for my project
... I would prefer an open source ... Well, no, but they have to distribute those modifications under the LGPL. ... to a copyright attorney might be worthwhile. ... will of course cost you. ...
(alt.os.linux) - Re: Ingres: An Open Source Rival to Oracle
... ingres open source drivers with your software - ... against, for example glibc: LGPL, not GPL. ... operating system, will this operating system have to become GPL as ...
(comp.databases.ingres) - Re: Open Source - Licensing
... difference between LGPL and GPL. ... summaries the differences between the different main Open Source ... GPL = the whole application has to be GPL'ed ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical) - Re: How reliable is do a CRC on files?
... >>> What is the license on DCPCrypt? ... Is it public domain or is it ... >>> software or only open source stuff? ... >> Its LGPL, or equivalent. ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical) |
|
