Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: "Steven Woody" <narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Nov 2006 07:57:11 -0800
山之岚 wrote:
The ARM920T's specification and S3C210's specification are right.
but how to explain linux's report?
-
woody
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: Geronimo W. Christ Esq
- Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- References:
- Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: Steven Woody
- Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: 山之岚
- Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Next by Date: Re: Communication between threads of same PIDs
- Previous by thread: Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Next by thread: Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Index(es):
