Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: "山之岚" <lan54160@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Nov 2006 07:48:26 -0800
The ARM920T's specification and S3C210's specification are right.
On 11月21日, 下午3时26分, "Steven Woody" <narkewo....@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
i got a board build around samsung's S3C2410 ( might be 2410a, i am not
pretty sure ) which in turn build on ARM920T core.
Both in , i get know
the processor core has seperated 16k 64-way set-association data cache
and instruction cache. but, in the /proc/cpuinfo, i see,
Processor : ARM/CIRRUS Arm920Tsid(wb) rev 0 (v4l)
BogoMIPS : 99.94
Features : swp half thumb
CPU implementor : 0x41
CPU architecture: 4T
CPU variant : 0x1
CPU part : 0x920
CPU revision : 0
Cache type : write-back
Cache clean : cp15 c7 ops
Cache lockdown : format A
Cache unified : harvard
I size : 8192
I assoc : 32
I line length : 32
I sets : 8
D size : 8192
D assoc : 32
D line length : 32
D sets : 8
the info above indicates that the instruction cache and data cache is
8k 32-way set-association. i am wondering which information is right?
and, how the linux generated the cpuinfo file?
thanks.
-
woody
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: Steven Woody
- Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- References:
- Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: Steven Woody
- Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Prev by Date: Re: What's the meaning of 'assert' and 'deassert' ?
- Next by Date: Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Previous by thread: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Next by thread: Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|