Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: "Geronimo W. Christ Esq" <thegreatsuprendo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:13:35 +0000
Steven Woody wrote:
山之岚 wrote:
The ARM920T's specification and S3C210's specification are right.
but how to explain linux's report?
Use the source, Luke. Nobody here knows what kernel you're running or
what modifications have been made to the source, except you.
.
- References:
- Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: Steven Woody
- Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: 山之岚
- Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- From: Steven Woody
- Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Prev by Date: Re: how to use promiscuous mode without receiving the packages from localhost?
- Previous by thread: Re: Should I Believe /proc/cpuinfo ?
- Next by thread: What's the meaning of 'assert' and 'deassert' ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|