Re: ARM development board recommendation
- From: phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 27 May 2007 04:09:24 GMT
On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:53:22 +0200 TW <blabberdeblab@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
|
| Hi I'm using currently an arm board by technologic (ts7300), several models
| in different price categories. There is a backdraw: it's a 2.4 kernel, but
| there is a rtai variant available for free. If you've a lot of time you
| could create your own 2.6kernel, which I did for board with another
| processor type.
Is that "www.technologic.com"? I hope they have some other domain name,
as the "www.technologic.com" site is pure flash, totally lame and useless.
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2007-05-26-2307@xxxxxxxx |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARM development board recommendation
- From: Steve Calfee
- Re: ARM development board recommendation
- References:
- ARM development board recommendation
- From: Matthias Kaehlcke
- Re: ARM development board recommendation
- From: TW
- ARM development board recommendation
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems with Ext2fs on a CF card.
- Next by Date: Re: power management on embedded linux?
- Previous by thread: Re: ARM development board recommendation
- Next by thread: Re: ARM development board recommendation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|