Re: Selecting embedded Linux for a new medical device project (LONG)
- From: "DavidK" <PleaseReplyTo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:36:11 GMT
Thanks Michael for the excellent info and for opening my eyes to soft-core
CPU technology using FPGAs.
It looks like a flexible and lower-cost alternative to using a single-board
computer, though my unfamiliarity with it makes me a little shy about
recommending it for our new product. I'll do more online research, and will
add it to our list of hardware possibilities for this project.
DK
"Michael Schnell" <mschnell_at_lumino_dot_de@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fe2b65$fru$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
itAt this stage, we have not decided which CPU will be used, but I suspect
Intelwill be a single-board computer (such as a PC/104 form factor) with an
x86 or compatible processor.
IMHO a x86 CPU is much too high performance level and not enough "long
living chip-design" for this "deeply embedded" application.
I would first look at what hardware is useful for the application. If
there is a need for an FPGA, you can look at stuff like NIOS or
Microblaze, that can be programmed in the FPGA without the need for
additional hardware.
-Michael
.
- References:
- Selecting embedded Linux for a new medical device project (LONG)
- From: DavidK
- Re: Selecting embedded Linux for a new medical device project (LONG)
- From: Michael Schnell
- Selecting embedded Linux for a new medical device project (LONG)
- Prev by Date: Re: embedded baord with RS-485 and ethernet
- Next by Date: crosstools-0.43 failing to build gcc-4.1.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Selecting embedded Linux for a new medical device project (LONG)
- Next by thread: Re: Selecting embedded Linux for a new medical device project (LONG)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|