Re: Which is faster? Dual 1 ghz. or a Single 2 ghz.
From: Techno (nobody_at_nospam4me.com)
Date: 08/27/03
- Next message: Andrew Schulman: "Re: SerialATA"
- Previous message: Colin: "Re: USB IDE Enclosures?"
- Next in thread: Eric Lee Green: "Re: Which is faster? Dual 1 ghz. or a Single 2 ghz."
- Reply: Eric Lee Green: "Re: Which is faster? Dual 1 ghz. or a Single 2 ghz."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:03:37 GMT
Steve wrote:
> If money is a real issue, then a single, fast chip would still make you
> very happy. But see if you can beg, borrow, or steal a dual-CPU machine
> to try out, then decide whether it's worth the extra cost.
>
> steve
Very insightful!
Thanks for the reply,
I know their are variables but generally speaking.
If someone were compiling a very large program, which would get done first?
The dual 1 ghz. machine or the single 2 ghz. machine?
I'm leaning on the dual processor server. But really don't care to throw
money out the window.
Thanks again.
Any other reply's would be helpful.
- Next message: Andrew Schulman: "Re: SerialATA"
- Previous message: Colin: "Re: USB IDE Enclosures?"
- Next in thread: Eric Lee Green: "Re: Which is faster? Dual 1 ghz. or a Single 2 ghz."
- Reply: Eric Lee Green: "Re: Which is faster? Dual 1 ghz. or a Single 2 ghz."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|