Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?
From: Steve Martin (smartinwate_at_adelphia.net)
Date: 09/15/03
- Next message: Jaideep: "Configuring dual sound modules"
- Previous message: Jerry McBride: "Re: USB mass storage failure"
- In reply to: Daeron: "Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?"
- Next in thread: James Knott: "Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?"
- Reply: James Knott: "Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 01:02:30 GMT
Daeron wrote:
> ".. The NTFS file system produced by Microsoft is widely regarded as
> the worst performing file system to reach market in at least ten
> years, and I am currently unable to cite an example of a worse
> performing file system .." Hans Reiser May 28 1998
>
> http://www.idiom.com/~beverly/complaint.html
>
> anyone got a more recent quote ?
Here are a couple:
http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/news.asp?ArticleID=97436
" Linux people don't believe in Intellectual Property Rights."
"Now SCO is suing every single user of Linux because they believe
parts of their UNIX code is being used in Linux."
Two bald-faced lies from Microsoft. Yes, Microsoft lies and does it poorly.
- Next message: Jaideep: "Configuring dual sound modules"
- Previous message: Jerry McBride: "Re: USB mass storage failure"
- In reply to: Daeron: "Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?"
- Next in thread: James Knott: "Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?"
- Reply: James Knott: "Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
