Re: LINUX Keyboards: 101 key pre-programmed and original IBM mechanical !!

From: Alan Connor (zzzzzz_at_xxx.yyy)
Date: 10/29/03

  • Next message: Doug Mitton: "Re: Damage CDROM drive by mounting?"
    Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:59:07 GMT
    
    

    On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:49:31 GMT, Frank <bbunny@bqik.net> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > "Chris Rainey" <marin_linuxer@linuxcult.com> wrote in message
    > news:f230ca66.0310281957.3d3419f6@posting.google.com...
    >| Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote in message
    > news:<0xCnb.6392$RQ1.5679@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
    >| > You know, I've been wanting a couple of those. But because you have
    > spammed
    >| > the Usenet, I will NOT be doing business with your firm.
    >| >
    >| > Ever.
    >|
    >| Ummmm .... I'm not affiliated with that firm. I'm just an enthusiast
    >| who spent hours looking for these sorts of keyboards. Perhaps my post
    >| will save you and other's such an amount of time(?).
    >|
    >| Do you know of other places? Which ones, please?
    >|
    >| BTW: I'm rather new to "The Usenet" and I would really appreciate
    >| knowing how my post would be considered "spam". I have no interest in
    >| creating "spam" and I thought this was the "...linux.hardware"
    >| group(!?). Please help me learn to be a more correct poster.
    >|
    >| Thank You.
    >
    > Just in case you don't know pckeyboards.com and pckeyboard.com
    > are two distinctly different places. The singular company quality is
    > above the plural.
    >
    >

    Maybe he is just an enthusiast sharing info.

    But it sure LOOKED like spam.

    And I do not recall seeing anyone express an interest in old keyboards in
    a very long while.

    Advertising hardware is NOT the usual sort of post on c.o.l.h.

    And since it is for sale, what the OP has advertised, that technically
    makes it spam, doesn't it?

    It's not as if it came up in the course of a thread.....

    Nor is it uncommon for (often seemingly) seperate businesses to advertise
    together.

    But the real clincher is the fact that if it WAS spam, it wouldn't
    look any different than it does.

    I still want to see whether he hangs around.

    ...............

    Spammers are getting much more selective these days, and it makes sense
    to limit this particular ad to this group.

    -- 
    Alan C    this post ends with    w
                                     q
    

  • Next message: Doug Mitton: "Re: Damage CDROM drive by mounting?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: lose down this news group.
      ... It's inundated with advertising; for Gucci and Rolex cheap copies, ... The noise went down from ~8 nV/rtHZ when the 1uF cap was connected to ... I put a couple of 30 uF 660 VAC oil filled capacitors on my computer screen, and I no longer saw any spam! ... That attracts spammers and their posts add to the activity and boost the ratings and fuels the spammers' greed. ...
      (sci.electronics.basics)
    • Re: [OT] Yahoos Antispam proposal
      ... > So spammers will simply write their own pgp signatures. ... > make the whole business profitable. ... Spam is a BILLION dollar industry. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: INFO: What is personalized publicity?
      ... here and in electronic predecessors since the 1980s, ... enough variations of spam to know that spam with syrup on it is still ... You are advertising in a public newsgroup whose charter and FAQ explicitly ban advertising. ... Google are less than ideal at dealing with spammers who use their services, but it is nevertheless probably worth my while sending the articles numbers from your multi-posts this morning to their abuse desk. ...
      (rec.arts.sf.composition)
    • Re: Massive SPAM Increase
      ... I must say that I *never* even glance at headers any more. ... But I do study spam *content* very intently. ... I *think* this happens actually for *business* reasons. ... I have a feeling that the spammers tend to operate on a monthly cycle. ...
      (Incidents)
    • Re: SFF and MIME
      ... That is why the sender is willing to pay for the advertising: ... Most spam these days is sent through botnets, groups of virus infected computers controlled more by the spammers than by their owners so they can send millions of pieces of spam from around the world with a single command that is unlikely to be tracked back to them. ...
      (comp.os.vms)