AGP issue
From: SKH (skh_at_yoyodyne.net)
Date: 01/29/04
- Next message: linuxquestion_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Source files compiled. Why no loadable module?"
- Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: what is 64bitCPU?"
- Next in thread: Dances With Crows: "Re: AGP issue"
- Reply: Dances With Crows: "Re: AGP issue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:08:17 GMT
I've got two Linux boxes with kernels compiled with AGP support, as a
module. For box A I have the following in my logs:
Jan 29 10:41:56 A kernel: Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
Jan 29 10:41:56 A kernel: agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 431M
Jan 29 10:41:56 A kernel: agpgart: Detected an Intel(R) 845G Chipset.
Jan 29 10:41:56 A kernel: agpgart: Detected 8060K stolen memory.
Jan 29 10:41:56 A kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xf0000000
The logs in box B contain the following:
Jan 26 13:46:39 B kernel: Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
Jan 26 13:46:39 B kernel: agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M
Jan 26 13:46:39 B kernel: agpgart: Detected Via Apollo Pro KT133 chipset
Jan 26 13:46:39 B kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xd0000000
In A, the agpgart module seems to be used
A# lsmod
agpgart 24552 6 (autoclean)
whereas in B I get
B# lsmod
agpgart 13840 0 (unused)
Why the difference? The graphics board on A is an Intel 82845G/GL,
whereas on B it is an Nvidia Riva TNT2 Model 64.
What am I missing here?
- Next message: linuxquestion_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Source files compiled. Why no loadable module?"
- Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: what is 64bitCPU?"
- Next in thread: Dances With Crows: "Re: AGP issue"
- Reply: Dances With Crows: "Re: AGP issue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
