backtrace() and IA64
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:41:29 -0500
Anyone know if backtrace() works the same on the IA64 as it does on vanilla
x86? On an x86 box, I get a postive return value greater than 1, but on
ia64, it's always 1. I need a way to get the same behavior from Linux on
ia64 as I do on a generic redhat system running on a Pentium 3 or 4
(generically x86). Thanks.
--
Replace null with putzin if you feel the urge to reply to me
-Pete
Relevant Pages
- Re: Studio 10 compilers for Solaris released
... It's not the Sparc architecture that's the problem, ... * IA64 doesn't run previous binaries well enough to be competitive, ... since converting 32 bit x86 binaries to an engine tuned for VLIW ... the desktop technical computing market ...
(comp.unix.solaris) - Re: Intel and Microsoft provide higher 32-bit applications performance on Itanium
... > If the question is whether an Itanium running exclusively x86 applications ... > that has been ported to IA64. ... If you can run Eudora, ...
(comp.os.vms) - Re: VC++6 LNK1112 Error
... the IA64 version of lib files, while my program is for x86 platform. ... > Itanium into a piece of code destined for an x86. ... > correctly select your target to be an Itanium. ...
(microsoft.public.vc.mfc) - Re: What cpus to compile for (in order)?
... >>> I'm at the stage of looking at code generation options and would like to ... >> in my case, I aim for x86 and x86-64, and that is about it. ... >> as for ia64, I am not sure if it has much chance of really going anywhere ... structure, different treatment of registers, ...). ...
(comp.lang.misc) - Re: Maybe HP should get out of the hardware business....
... larger x86 systems. ... AMD cannot really afford to make as large dies as Intel. ... Intel may choose to have more stuff on it's IA64 chips, such as cores, ... I would like to buy Proliant systems with IA64 chips in a few years. ...
(comp.os.vms) |
|
