why is the S parameter to hdparm so ridiculous?
From: Mark (none_at_xxxyyy.com)
Date: 05/23/04
- Next message: baskitcaise: "Re: Installing on machine with IT8212 IDE-RAID chipset?"
- Previous message: dave: "Re: Graphics card for 1700MHz"
- Next in thread: Hactar: "Re: why is the S parameter to hdparm so ridiculous?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Hactar: "Re: why is the S parameter to hdparm so ridiculous?"
- Reply: Holger Petersen: "Re: why is the S parameter to hdparm so ridiculous?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:47:46 -0400
man hdparm:
"Values from 1 to 240 specify multiples of 5 seconds, for timeouts from
5 seconds to 20 minutes. Values from 241 to 251 specify from 1 to 11
units of 30 minutes, for timeouts from 30 minutes to 5.5 hours. A
value of 252 signifies a timeout of 21 minutes, 253 sets a
vendor-defined timeout, and 255 is interpreted as 21 minutes plus
15 seconds."
This looks crazy, why can't the user just put in the
S value in straight seconds or minutes?
Mark
- Next message: baskitcaise: "Re: Installing on machine with IT8212 IDE-RAID chipset?"
- Previous message: dave: "Re: Graphics card for 1700MHz"
- Next in thread: Hactar: "Re: why is the S parameter to hdparm so ridiculous?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Hactar: "Re: why is the S parameter to hdparm so ridiculous?"
- Reply: Holger Petersen: "Re: why is the S parameter to hdparm so ridiculous?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|