Re: CPU - Hertz v. Cache
From: SKH (skh_at_yoyodyne.net)
Date: 06/02/04
- Next message: Mike: "Re: CPU - Hertz v. Cache"
- Previous message: Keith: "CPU - Hertz v. Cache"
- In reply to: Keith: "CPU - Hertz v. Cache"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: CPU - Hertz v. Cache"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:04:12 GMT
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 07:30:34 -0700, Keith wrote:
> I've another question about the system I'll be building for myself...
>
> Imagining for a moment that I have chosen a mainboard that suits me fine,
> but requires a Pentium 4 CPU.
>
> What's better for a given price? Higher clock speed, or more cache?
>
> For example:
> - P4-C, 3.2 GHz with 8KBytes of Level 1 and 512KBytes of Level 2
> cache for EUR285
> - P4-E, 2.8 GHz with 16KBytes of Level 1 and 1024KBytes of Level 2
> cache for EUR190
>
> I'd be tempted to go for the second... Keith.
So would I.
- Next message: Mike: "Re: CPU - Hertz v. Cache"
- Previous message: Keith: "CPU - Hertz v. Cache"
- In reply to: Keith: "CPU - Hertz v. Cache"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: CPU - Hertz v. Cache"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
