Re: Dealing with Unreliable Serial Bus (USB NIC)
From: Dave Stanton (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: Lasse Jensen: "Re: TvTuner & Mandrake"
- Previous message: rodg: "minimal linux install from iso..."
- In reply to: Linnix: "Re: Dealing with Unreliable Serial Bus (USB NIC)"
- Next in thread: Linnix: "Re: Dealing with Unreliable Serial Bus (USB NIC)"
- Reply: Linnix: "Re: Dealing with Unreliable Serial Bus (USB NIC)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:27:45 +0100
>> Why are you doing this over USB ?
>
> This particular box does not have standard bus extensions. The
> customers have lots of them as paper weight. We are helping them to
> make use of the box with minimum cost. Currently, they have to
> manually power-cycle the USB-NIC and restarting dhcpcd. They would
> prefer to have it up unattended, in case of power lost. The boxes are
> powered up all the time.
I would have thought it would be better to stick some network cards in
them if poss. Afterall, USB is slow compared to standard ethernet at
100MB as you are finding and it would be more standard to use ethernet.
Surely the cost of it being unreliable is outweighing doing it this
way. You seem to be making a lot of work for yourselves.
HTH
Dave
-- Some people use windows, others have a life.
- Next message: Lasse Jensen: "Re: TvTuner & Mandrake"
- Previous message: rodg: "minimal linux install from iso..."
- In reply to: Linnix: "Re: Dealing with Unreliable Serial Bus (USB NIC)"
- Next in thread: Linnix: "Re: Dealing with Unreliable Serial Bus (USB NIC)"
- Reply: Linnix: "Re: Dealing with Unreliable Serial Bus (USB NIC)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|