Re: Switching to rack based systems
From: Davide Bianchi (davideyeahsure_at_onlyforfun.net)
Date: 10/16/04
- Next message: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Previous message: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Next in thread: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Reply: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Reply: j19923_at_covad.net: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 16 Oct 2004 17:38:54 GMT
On 2004-10-16, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> wrote:
> What seems to happen is that once it goes into the rack, in a remote
> room, that "out of sight, out of mind" leads to there being less of a
> need to upgrade/maintain it. It just stays there, working.
And this bring the second 'con' part: buy the machine _right_ the
first time. Because sometimes you just can't add any more memory
or disk or whatever, so be sure that the specs are correct before
installing.
Davide
-- Violence, rude language, excessive drinking, paganism. It's hard to find children's books like that these days. --Stig Morten Valstad on alt.sysadmin.recovery
- Next message: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Previous message: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Next in thread: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Reply: Christopher Browne: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Reply: j19923_at_covad.net: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]