Re: Switching to rack based systems
j19923_at_covad.net
Date: 10/18/04
- Next message: Jules: "Re: Power saving/spinning down RAID drives"
- Previous message: Jules: "Re: One man's trash..."
- In reply to: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Next in thread: John-Paul Stewart: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:15:54 -0400
You are right! The traditional 1U/2U rackmount servers (chassis) have the
difficulty of un-racking units from racks for upgrade services. My
department has recently converted many traditional 1U/2U based servers to
blade-style servers. We use a new styled rackmount chassis called ATXBalde.
It is a non-proprietary ATX based blade server chassis. It offers better
server management and way much easier to remove a server from a rack for
routine upgrade services.
ATXBlade URL: http://www.rackmount.com/Rackmt/ATXBladeS100.htm
"Davide Bianchi" <davideyeahsure@onlyforfun.net> wrote in message > And this
bring the second 'con' part: buy the machine _right_ the
> first time. Because sometimes you just can't add any more memory
> or disk or whatever, so be sure that the specs are correct before
> installing.
>
> Davide
- Next message: Jules: "Re: Power saving/spinning down RAID drives"
- Previous message: Jules: "Re: One man's trash..."
- In reply to: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Next in thread: John-Paul Stewart: "Re: Switching to rack based systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|