Is Reiserfs much slower when mounting / ?
From: stu (stuartb_at_thelinuxlink.net)
Date: 10/30/05
- Next message: General Schvantzkoph: "Re: broadcomm nic card driver installation on linux 6.2 with 2.2.22 kernel"
- Previous message: stu: "Re: Experience with Gigabyte K8NF-9 Mobo (Athlon 64 3200+ Venice core CPU?"
- Next in thread: Grant: "Re: Is Reiserfs much slower when mounting / ?"
- Reply: Grant: "Re: Is Reiserfs much slower when mounting / ?"
- Reply: John Thompson: "Re: Is Reiserfs much slower when mounting / ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:05:37 -0500
I can't seem to find any info or benchmarks on this but I have 2
partitions on an external drive. One is ext2 and the other is reiserfs.
If I mount them I notice that the ext3 is mounted almost instantly and
the reiserfs takes 2.6 seconds even though it is much smaller. I have
SUSE 10 installed on a 100GB disk and during bootup there is a big lag
as / is mounted.
It seems that reiserfs has a bit of a hit to bootup times if you have a
large partition to mount as root.
Anybody else think this is the case?
I would not use a non-journaling fs like ext2, and I understand reiserfs
is a little better at fitting lots of small files into a fs but I don't
like the extra few seconds at bootup.
Thanks for any input
- Next message: General Schvantzkoph: "Re: broadcomm nic card driver installation on linux 6.2 with 2.2.22 kernel"
- Previous message: stu: "Re: Experience with Gigabyte K8NF-9 Mobo (Athlon 64 3200+ Venice core CPU?"
- Next in thread: Grant: "Re: Is Reiserfs much slower when mounting / ?"
- Reply: Grant: "Re: Is Reiserfs much slower when mounting / ?"
- Reply: John Thompson: "Re: Is Reiserfs much slower when mounting / ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|