Re: packard bell ?
- From: Dances With Crows <danSPANceswitTRAPhcrows@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:04:20 -0600
On 26 Jan 2006 08:36:39 -0800, greg staggered into the Black Sun and
said:
> I keep hearing bad things about Packard Bell.
Yep, they made a bad name for themselves by selling cheap crap.
> They have good deals on AMD based [desktops]. Should I go for one, or
> [put together] a homebuilt machine with the same components?
Avoid Packard Bell, and for $DEITY's sake, don't use the same components
that they'd use. Buy *good* components, not cheap ones. These will
have fewer unexplained weird problems. Diagnosing and fixing
unexplained weird problems with hardware is usually a total waste of
your time. HTH,
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / mail: TRAP + SPAN don't belong
http://www.brainbench.com / "He is a rhythmic movement of the
-----------------------------/ penguins, is Tux." --MegaHAL
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: packard bell ?
- From: dion_b
- Re: packard bell ?
- From: greg
- Re: packard bell ?
- References:
- packard bell ?
- From: greg
- packard bell ?
- Prev by Date: Re: good laptop/linux combination with funcitoning wireless?
- Next by Date: Re: No AT command responses
- Previous by thread: packard bell ?
- Next by thread: Re: packard bell ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|