Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- From: bowman <bowman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:12:33 -0600
wizzywiz wrote:
Is anybody aware of any reason why Suse would show a half-gig less than
the RAM installed on just the IBM, or any further tests I can try?
Onboard video? One of my systems shows 128 mB less than the physical memory
after the video controller grabs its chunk. I believe even some cards will
hit on system memory if they are feeling deprived.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- From: chuckcar
- Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- References:
- Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- From: wizzywiz
- Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why there is timeout error message when I plug a USB disk?
- Next by Date: Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- Previous by thread: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- Next by thread: Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- Index(es):
