Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- From: chuckcar <chuck@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Jul 2006 01:47:26 +0200
bowman <bowman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1153062159_21906@xxxxxxxx:
wizzywiz wrote:
Is anybody aware of any reason why Suse would show a half-gig less
than the RAM installed on just the IBM, or any further tests I can
try?
Onboard video? One of my systems shows 128 mB less than the physical
memory after the video controller grabs its chunk. I believe even some
cards will hit on system memory if they are feeling deprived.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the
World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms -
Total Privacy via Encryption =----
500Meg for a video card? hardly likely.
--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- From: wizzywiz
- Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- From: bowman
- Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- Prev by Date: Re: Alsa question
- Next by Date: Re: Customer Display
- Previous by thread: Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- Next by thread: Re: Why would Suse, on opteron, miss 500 megs of RAM?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
