Re: SATA question
- From: John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:37:05 -0400
AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:26:25 -0400, John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[snip]
The IRQ balancing under discussion is a method for having interrupts handled by the different processors in an SMP system.
Then it is irrelevent to this thread.
In message-ID <131bitk83tsv24f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> the original poster wrote in part, "And WTF are all my IRQ on one CPU? It's a Core 2 Duo.... Maybe it's a kernel issue?" Thus IRQ balancing seems relevant to me!
.
- References:
- SATA question
- From: Captain Dondo
- Re: SATA question
- From: AZ Nomad
- Re: SATA question
- From: Captain Dondo
- Re: SATA question
- From: Måns Rullgård
- Re: SATA question
- From: John-Paul Stewart
- Re: SATA question
- From: Captain Dondo
- Re: SATA question
- From: John-Paul Stewart
- Re: SATA question
- From: Captain Dondo
- Re: SATA question
- From: John-Paul Stewart
- Re: SATA question
- From: AZ Nomad
- Re: SATA question
- From: John-Paul Stewart
- Re: SATA question
- From: AZ Nomad
- SATA question
- Prev by Date: Re: Question regarding persistent mount points for multiple USB drives
- Next by Date: Motehrboard comments
- Previous by thread: Re: SATA question
- Next by thread: Re: SATA question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|