Re: Multiple partitions on external USB HDD?
- From: Rikishi 42 <fsck_spam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:58:56 +0200
On 2007-06-26, Olaf <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Unfortunately, FAT32 does not allow files bigger than 4GB, and I
[couldn't get] the tar option "--multi-volume" to work with a single
medium. (If someone would be able to give me a hint there
tar cO (dirs to tar up) | split --bytes=4000000000 - filename
...splits tar's output into chunks slightly smaller than 4G into
filenameaa , filenameab, filenameac ... filenamezz. "cat filename* |
tar xf -" to restore.
I'd even limit the to 2 GB.
Would SuSE 10.2 properly recognize, i.e. (auto)mount a [USB device
with multiple partitions, one FAT32, one ext3]?
Automounters suck, but I think it'd work appropriately. HTH,
yes they DO suck.
I prefer a fix mount-point in /etc/fstab.
No need for it. Multiple partitions on USB are no problem.
Using /dev/disk/by-uuid helps with the problem of changing device namesWhy not. But giving a disk a label is enough. Doesn't work with Reiser, but
with usb-devices
who'd want to use that on an USB drive? And using ext3 is not that great,
eighter. Stick to ext2, I'd say.
Just give the partitions a label (ext2label for ext2/3, can't remember what
tools I used for fat.
Has the advantage to show up with the same name on other systems, too.
--
There is an art, it says, or rather, a knack to flying.
The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
Douglas Adams
.
- References:
- Re: Multiple partitions on external USB HDD?
- From: Olaf
- Re: Multiple partitions on external USB HDD?
- Prev by Date: Re: Do you know that Norton antivirus is itself a virus..?
- Next by Date: Re: P5N-E SLI crapped out
- Previous by thread: Re: Multiple partitions on external USB HDD?
- Next by thread: Re: P5N-E SLI crapped out
- Index(es):