Re: running linux on bad ram
- From: Angela Meyer <Angela@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:46:26 +0200
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:15:00 +0200, Thomas wrote:
Uzytkownik "Gregory Shearman" <ZekeGregory@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisal w
wiadomosci news:2441943.DfuUPs4p3m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ok , after finding 40 000 errors with memtest at about 51 % progress I
decided to buy a new module.
Allodoxaphobia wrote:
(I spent FAR too much time trying to get around the problem with the
kernel option ala: badram=0x1c23f5cc,0xfffffffc. The documentation on
that option is WRETCHED, and to this day I firmly believe the optionis
totally bogus. Don't go there.)
I don't find it at all in the kernel parameter list of 2.6.21-gentoo-r4.
Maybe you are right, the parameter is bogus.
--
Regards,
Gregory.
Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power
My experiance excactely,
sometimes its better just to give up and spent some mony on good hardware.
dag,
angela@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- running linux on bad ram
- From: Thomas
- Re: running linux on bad ram
- From: Allodoxaphobia
- Re: running linux on bad ram
- From: Gregory Shearman
- Re: running linux on bad ram
- From: Thomas
- running linux on bad ram
- Prev by Date: Re: Serial Port Configuration
- Next by Date: Re: Serial Port Configuration
- Previous by thread: Re: running linux on bad ram
- Next by thread: ng for linux + exam
- Index(es):