Re: Recommendation for storage system hardware (mainboard, controllers)
- From: Wolfgang Draxinger <wdraxinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:00:32 +0100
* wrote:
Reminding everybody that external drives are for backup purpose
only, and shall not be switched on usually otherwise will
quickly fry, he claims to have 3TB storage occupied. Now,
12Mpixel raw+jpg file takes about 22M each, so we're talking
about more than 130k photos, a huge number. I cannot understand
why one wants to have them online all the time. Spending just
1" to merely watch the photo will take 1.5 days of continuous
work. Even if he shoots video only, a dvd is about 4G, still
more than 700 Hollywood films on 3TB.
You're thinking of digital SLR cameras. However this guy is
working with huge format cameras. One image easyly has 20k x 10k
pixels, i.e. 200Mpixel.
One application is e.g. product photography, so that you can zoom
deep into the pictures. Another are ultra high resolution
panorama images, which are then printed on walls. You stand in
the middle of a room and see the panorama of a city, but then
you near the picture to 30cm and can clearly recognize every
detail.
Wolfgang Draxinger
--
E-Mail address works, Jabber: hexarith@xxxxxxxxxx, ICQ: 134682867
.
- References:
- Recommendation for storage system hardware (mainboard, controllers)
- From: Wolfgang Draxinger
- Recommendation for storage system hardware (mainboard, controllers)
- Prev by Date: Re: -64bit Ubuntu or 32bit?
- Next by Date: Re: -64bit Ubuntu or 32bit?
- Previous by thread: Re: Recommendation for storage system hardware (mainboard, controllers)
- Next by thread: Re: Recommendation for storage system hardware (mainboard, controllers)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|