Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: Darren Salt <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:41:07 +0000
I demand that heavytull may or may not have written...
Darren Salt wrote:[snip]
0x32 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 SlowHmm? Some ATI-provided libraries lying around, perhaps? (I've not seen
Segmentation fault
glxinfo segfault before...)
yeas, i completely uninstalled the proprietary drivers and now there is no
more that segfault.
:-)
by the way is that normal the the open source driver doesn't provide direct
rendering?
No. Something's missing or isn't being recognised; check /var/log/Xorg.0.log.
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Generate power using sun, wind, water, nuclear. FORGET COAL AND OIL.
I'd like to, but I have to knit some dust bunnies for a charity bazaar.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: heavytull
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: Shadow_7
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- References:
- the latest ati radeon driver
- From: heavytull
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: Shadow_7
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: heavytull
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: Darren Salt
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: heavytull
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: Darren Salt
- Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- From: heavytull
- the latest ati radeon driver
- Prev by Date: Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- Next by Date: Intel Linux supported mo-bo's
- Previous by thread: Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- Next by thread: Re: the latest ati radeon driver
- Index(es):
Loading