Re: sse3 or not sse3
- From: darkblueB <brian.darkblueb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 24, 1:41 am, Måns Rullgård <m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is the real story? I am keen on sse3 (more on that later)
Isn't pni an alias for sse3? I know my Core2 has sse3, and
/proc/cpuinfo doesn't mention sse3 here either.
aha!
thats what I was looking for.. it seems that is true - a quick Google
search returns some good looking results.
Thanks! (very confusing)
also - yes, Brisbane is the core.. Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is the name of
the chip I believe, but the name 4400+ is repeated at least 4
times !! (very confusing)
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Athlon_64_microprocessors
.
- References:
- sse3 or not sse3
- From: darkblueB
- Re: sse3 or not sse3
- From: Måns Rullgård
- sse3 or not sse3
- Prev by Date: Re: Can a (second) hard disc consist of only 1 extended/logical partition? Or is at least one primary necessary?
- Next by Date: Re: Can a (second) hard disc consist of only 1 extended/logical partition? Or is at least one primary necessary?
- Previous by thread: Re: sse3 or not sse3
- Next by thread: Re: sse3 or not sse3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|