Re: AMD 780G vs. 690G chipsets
- From: Dan Lenski <dlenski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:50:16 GMT
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:14:07 +0100, darklight wrote:
esata is good only if you have an external hard drive with an esata
connection. I use one transfer rate is much better than usb
Yeah, I don't have one yet, but I was thinking it'd be a nice thing to
have. It is annoying that eSATA is unpowered though... the main thing I
like about 2.5" USB drives is you don't need a power brick with your
enclosure. Maybe I should hold out until they come out with a powered
version of eSATA... is this on the horizon?
my advice go for the more expensive one if you play dvds through pc and
have an amp that supports HDMI or a lcd screen with hdmi you will
benifit.
Is the HDMI support of the cheaper 690G model inferior?
it all boils down to what you use the pc for
Office tasks, email & web, software development, and light-use web
serving. :-)
Dan
.
- References:
- AMD 780G vs. 690G chipsets
- From: Dan Lenski
- Re: AMD 780G vs. 690G chipsets
- From: darklight
- AMD 780G vs. 690G chipsets
- Prev by Date: Intel PRO/1000 network adapter
- Next by Date: Re: Intel PRO/1000 network adapter
- Previous by thread: Re: AMD 780G vs. 690G chipsets
- Next by thread: Intel PRO/1000 network adapter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
