Re: Raid: software or hardware
- From: vertigo <teknet7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:16:57 +0200
Hello
I have mainboard: gigabyte P965S3.
I have 2 SATA interfaces using builtin Jmicron controller
(and another 4 SATA interfaces)
I upgraded bios to version F12.
I want to make mirror raid.
What's better to use: software or hardware(jmicron)?
Hardware RAID is always preferable over software RAID *if* it is available.
However, I sincerely doubt that the onboard SATA RAID of your motherboard
will be a hardware RAID.
Most likely, it'll be a hardware-assisted software RAID, or if you will, a
"WinRAID", just like a Winmodem isn't a real modem.
1. Using hardware, jmicron (creating raid from bios).
Will gentoo see it ? Is it stable ?
I do not know the JMicron, but true hardware SATA RAID from a chip on the
motherboard is extremely rare and would also make the board more expensive
than its peers.
Even if you enable the RAID functionality of an SATA onboard
hardware-assisted software RAID, this will only be seen as a RAID by
Windows, and then will require you to load the appropriate driver for it,
if Windows doesn't have a driver for it by itself.
In GNU/Linux, such a device is seen as a simple SATA controller, regardless
of whether the RAID functionality is enabled or not, because basically
that's what it is.
If one disk fails how will i know ?
Both true hardware RAID and software RAID would report this via /syslogd,/
or possibly via an additional daemon like Adaptec's Storage Manager for
Adaptec RAID adapters.
Will there be no problem with replacing bad disk with new one ?
The replacement of a failed drive in a RAID array is always subject to
certain delays and restrictions. Not all RAID adapters (or hard disks!)
support hotplugging.
When a drive has been replaced, most hardware RAID adapters will
automatically rebuild the array - which takes some time and will slow down
the machine's performance somewhat - but in software RAID, I believe you
have to rebuild the array manually using /mdadm./
thanx for this info. That's true - jmicron is not real hardware RAID.
Linux kernel has drivers for jmicron software/hardware RAID.
So - what is better ?
1. fully software RAID based on mdadm tool
2. or software/hardware jmicron RAID ?
What would you suggest ?
What is faster ? What makes CPU works less ?
Which solution is more reliable ?
Thanx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Raid: software or hardware
- From: Aragorn
- Re: Raid: software or hardware
- References:
- Raid: software or hardware
- From: vertigo
- Re: Raid: software or hardware
- From: Aragorn
- Raid: software or hardware
- Prev by Date: Re: Raid: software or hardware
- Next by Date: Re: Raid: software or hardware
- Previous by thread: Re: Raid: software or hardware
- Next by thread: Re: Raid: software or hardware
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|